Sunday 27 December 2020

Romulus season 1 – Not watching it, is a CRIME.

 


RATING 09/10 

 


It is easy to get access to a lot of great show in this damn age of streaming services and it is also easy to get lost in the shuffle for that same reason. And if the series in concern is not an English-speaking one then, that even plummet the chances of its discovery and then its appreciation, however great it might be. That being said, Romulus season 1 by Italian television channel “Sky Italy” is just TOO GOOD to be missed.  

Too Good? 
The show roughly follows the legend of the formation of Rome by two brothers who were raised by a She-wolf. Unlike the popular interpretation, the creators of ‘Romulus” reconstructed the legend in as much realism as possible which could set off many purist and history buffs. But the sense of more realism made the world of “Romulus” Bleak, unforgiving and Frightening in an entertaining way. Mind you, despite of its Reality, the series is not devoid of magic and mysteries but that too could be broken down to illusions and misplaced faith.  

The series would be compared to Netflix’s Barbarians for being a contemporary series dealing with Roman empire and also because of the authenticity of linguistic efficiency that it is trying attain. Much like Barbarians, the characters in Romulus use legitimate verbiage that was supposed to be in use in the given area at that part of history. All of the narrations and dialogues in Romulus are done in archaic Latin that was reconstructed by the linguists and the historians who were brought in, to match the form of Latin that was spoken in eighth century B.C.  This part of the show was really exceptional, as It made you forget the fact that the people inside your screen are speaking in Latin, because of the smooth flow of the dialogues without any rigidity. It is also tremendous achievement by the actors, for the entire cast to the deliver the dialogues with emotion in a language that is not their first language, much less a language that’s been not in use for centuries.   

By the way, all this talk on “linguistic efficiency” may seem intimidating but not a single bit of fun is taken away from the show even if you do not enjoy that aspect of it. The characters are well written, the motivations are clear enough and the performance are great as they can be. where no main character out shined by the other, as all of them are equally excellent. And, when we as audience are sympathetic to the protagonist and root for him, you know that the series has done much of it right. 

 

Verdict 
The series is an epic historical adventure, a clear rival to “Game of Thrones” in terms of representing its brutal archaic world that is grounded on reality. It also captures the authenticity of ancient world by making all of its narrations and dialogues in Latin while putting a less popular but nevertheless entertaining take on the legend of Romus and Romulus. And even without the publicity and marketing constantly drumming “best” in your ears, Romulus has the “best” written all over it. 

Share:

Thursday 26 November 2020

Raised by Wolves – Is like “a pretty girl” you love but who doesn’t love you back.

 

Raised by Wolves is a HBOmax original science fiction series created by Aaron Guzikowski. It tells the saga of two androids, who arrives on Kepler-22b (a life inhabitable planet) commanded with the mission to raise children (From the frozen embryos that they brought with them) as atheist for Earth was annihilated by wars fought upon its people’s religious beliefs 

 


In spite of having the potential to become the next big series for HBO, over the course of its 10 episodes it struggles to provide a coherent narrative. The quality varies on its story telling although the gorgeousness of its visuals and production remained constant.  

The premise of the story is super interesting, a kinda of lord of the flies-esque commentary on the innocence or the animalistic nature of humans in the wild where we are not shackled by the morals of the society which were projected through the trapped children away from urban civilization and it also borrows the aspect from the ABC’s television milestone LOST, of its usage of the mystery of the unknown land as a tool to advance the plot further.  

The Androids “Mother” and “Father” played by Amanda Collins and Abubakar Salim are the stars of the show owing to the actors' believable performance as machines who do not comprehend human emotion and as uncompromising Guardians who are driven towards the completion of their mission despite of their failings and also due to their Character being extensively written even though towards the end of season the writers played little too carelessly with them, making them less android (being which was the very thing made these character really interesting); Mother’s shriek of pain because of her fetus and Father feeling jealous over Mother’s impregnation was certain notable instances that made them inconsistent of their portrayal. Aside from the androids, Travis Fimmel’s Caleb (of Viking fame) Commanded the attention of the viewers every time he was present, while the rest of the character was ill developed and showcased motivations that are downright confusing, Campion who was supposed to be the John connor of the show became annoying as Carl from walking dead and all the other characters especially the children were forgettable. 

Also, the story had multiple plots running along. Most of the moments these plots provided fell flat for not having the sufficient time to develop emotion onto its audience. At time it seemed that three seasons of story line was rushed into one as the idea seemed intriguing but the execution was premature. Raised by wolves also had a terrific villain in the prisoner/rapist which the series desperately needed halfway into the series, but how the writers used him was the series' biggest missed opportunity. And usage of pseudoscience in most places instead of actual science is a big letdown. 

All that being said, the involvement of Ridley Scott alone should make you watch this series as it has all of his sci-fi flairs. Alongside being the producer of the series, he also directed the first two episodes, which could stand head-to-head against any Sci fi movies ever created. Further, the Lore of the series is very rich and is waiting to be explored, in spite of the missed opportunities in this season the density of stories that could be told in the “Raised by wolves universe” in the future make errors that it made negligible.  

Verdict 
Regardless of the series' issues such as presenting the characters with confusing motivations, mishandling the should have-been main villain and making the androids less android-y towards the end, it still presents a sci-fi universe that is rich of its mythos which should recruit a loyal fan base, salivating to consume any future installments.

Share:

Thursday 12 November 2020

Messiah - the most terrifying antagonist you have ever seen

Messiah Season 1 review 


 

We have seen many intricately written, created characters or spotlighted personalities from real life as our antagonist to fit the narrative of the fictional or non-fictional medium it represents (an antagonist is the one who opposes the protagonist/hero. But the correctness of defining protagonist as the hero and antagonist as the villain is merely subjective). In spite of antagonist having a controversial opinion of value they usually impart this with violence and hypocrisy, but what if you have an antagonist who fights with peace and create chaos as a byproduct? Enter Al Masih the messiah! 

The premise is that a mysterious man “Al Masih” (the name that he would eventually be called by his followers) shows up in the war ridden Damascus and pronounces him being the messenger of the God who will lead them to their true purpose. He convinces the crowd of impressionable people and later the critics with “miracles”. We follow the CIA, journalists and various governments, who all consider Al Masih with suspicion and the miracles as act of trickery or just circumstantial.  

The series is a mix of movie Risen 2016, of witnessing the resurrection through the perspective of a non-believer and the series Homeland, where a similar case of CIA officer suspecting someone who everyone else adores. Retelling the story of the son of god in the 21st century might be dull, stale and very boring as most of the population has increasingly turned away from faith and leaving barley any crowd whole heartedly in believing the existence of all self-conscious creator. The series had a very serious possibility of becoming preachy if they had openly portrayed Al Masih as who he claimed to be, but fortunately the coyness of the truth and planting seeds of information that would make you doubt his motivation or discredit his miracles are the stroke of genius.  

The series also let you in on the trouble of the Messiah being real as it might mean for you to disown everything you have as physical or ideological and plead for redemption under him or give up redemption for having the freedom of being that we held so dear. And also similar to this premise, it indicates that even the celebrated human of the history “Jesus Christ” may have been a populist politician with vindictive agenda towards Roman empire in accordance to the Jewish narrative. 

Bottom line 
A man armed with peace is more violent than a man armed with violence itself, and if Al Masih is a trickster then he is brandishing peace to creating chaos and confusion and even if he is real, he just taking away freedom of choice among us and either way the existence of a Messiah is the most terrifying antagonist and the series was competent in engraving this aspect. 

 

Share:

Sunday 1 November 2020

The Invisible man A reboot that you won’t be disappointed with.


 

How many times have you seen in the last decade that a movie is rebooted or remade with much anticipation from its fans, only to be let down with an abomination that is devoid of the things which made the original so great?  Movies like Terminator, Ghostbusters come to mind. Either these dull reboots/remakes were completely unaware of what made the forerunner click or simply an obsession of not providing any further development/change except for the present political agenda in the apprehension of failure.
Fortunately, “The Invisible Man by Leigh Whannell” is neither of those treacherous types. It is not a fresh new take on the Classic universal’s invisible man series (the story heavily inspired from “Hollow Man”, another reboot of the said series of the year 2000).  But it did also provide a further intrigue in the franchise by developing Cecilia Kass from the archetypal damsel in distress in the beginning to something much more sinister towards the end. The character of Cecilia outshines even the legendary mad scientist Griffin who is synonymous with the invisible man and is the antagonist of this movie. The success of Cecilia kass as a character can be partly attributed to the script and partly to the portrayal of Elisabeth Moss (of Mad Men fame), who being an exceptional actor flushed out the character with her acting chops and elevated the movie in the process.

This time the movie goes like …..Cecilia ran away from her abusive- controlling boyfriend with the help of her sister Emily and found refuge in the house of James Lanier, a police officer who lives with his daughter Sydney. Now agoraphobic Celcila trenched in James’ house soon receives the message of  Adrian Griffin’s (her boyfriend) Suicide and was able to subside her fear and anguish. But soon she encounters strange events that lead her to suspect that Griffin is not dead but found a way to become invisible and is now stalking her.

Bottom Line
You may find the movie’s interpretation of Adrian Griffin’s invention of becoming invisible and ensuing his descent into madness not superior to the H.G. Wells’ science fiction landmark  but its graphic violence and the tension of being stalked is on point and the new lane it took with Celilia Kass, which is waiting to be explored in the future installments makes the movie indispensable on your 2020 watch list for any movie nerds out there.

Share:

Wednesday 23 September 2020

Faith criticized and not challenged the new Netflix feature, The Devil all the time.

 


The devil all the time may provide the audience with a bad perspective on faith but it by no means says that the faith is bad. Let me explain...there were three visible instances where the faith rather the christian faith of the 20th century was placed on rigorous scrutiny. 

 Instance one: Faith that feeds on suffering
When Arvin’s (around whom the story revolves around/ the protagonist) mother was dying of cancer, his father made him pray saying that doctors could not save her but the owner of their prayers could, if only they prayed hard enough to receive his kindness. His father, Willard even sacrificed Arvin’s beloved dog for the scripture has said so much of sacrificing the thing you love as the holiest of sacraments but still he lost his wife to the disease and killed himself soon after. 

This may show that suffering which is much advocated by faith only brings more suffering and it is almost true but this was the hardest of times of Willard and faith came at a terrible price. Previously the film has glimpsed us on how faith had led him safely through a world war and was used by him as refuge to provide clarity for the welfare of his family up to this point, the goodness of faith even was evident by the nature of his mother who adamant for Willard to marry an orphan girl who lost her family to the fire in return to the fruition of her prayer to bring back Willard from the war unscathed. We should never judge anything when it faulted, forgetting all the time it did not and nor says the film. 

Instance Two: Faith that is deceiving.
Preacher Roy who believed that faith takes away fear and pain deluded that he was blessed in a way to heal others and reincarnate the dead, pricked his wife’s neck with a screw-driver and left her dead on the ground. He then prayed for her soul to return to her body with nothing more than scratch but was broken when he saw his beloved cold, crimson and still before his lap. 

Instance three: Faith that is out right corrupted!
Years later, Reverend Preston uses his charming speech, scripture and promises of enlightenment to oblige young girls to have his way with them. He even defiled and then denied Roy’s own daughter Lenora, causing her to eventually commit suicide with his baby on her womb.

 In both of these instances the failure of the institution of church is highlighted, the former is a portrayal of how an institution long standing such as religious faith that structured human civilization can be strayed off even with the best of its believers, and the latter is a showcase of its outright corruption. In the case of Roy, his absolute passion gave rise to a poisonous idea of an otherwise honest man who refused to be adulterous with a young woman when asked by her husband at gun point which resulted in his own demise. On the other hand Rev. Preston was an evil son of a bitch (like Willard says it) who just used the faith of people for him to prey on young girls. 

Bottom-line
It is easy to pass judgement on anything and more so on the controversial topic as faith. But it is important to remember all the times when faith prevented us from being more evil than we were. The Devil all the time by no means tells its audience that faith is bad, the movie just builds upon times it faulted and you can tell it was interesting when you ran through the well over of its two hours of run time with ease. Further the movies should be on watchlist for anyone who is a fan of Cormac McCarthy or John Steinbeck.

Share:

Friday 4 September 2020

Should you listen to Rich dad? A review of Rich dad poor dad by Robert Kiyosaki.

 

 

 

It is eminent to understand or educate ourselves about the author or the advocate of a certain dogma before consuming and then practicing it. This should be non refutable in your checklist whenever you come across any new idea especially if you are inclined to lean towards it and also when if thus said idea is from a nonfiction literary medium. I cannot stress the above said statement enough especially when we live in a world where a platform is given to everyone irrespective of their qualification to put it forth. And even if unqualified they should not be denied of their platform to speak their opinion with all due respect to their freedom of speech, it is us who should incline or not to their statement with respect to author’s qualification. That being said,

 

Robert Kiyosaki
         

The Good…                 As per Rich dad company website (https://www.richdad.com/about/robert-t-kiyosaki) which Kiyosaki founded,  he grew up in a small town of Hilo, Hawaii. He went to college at Kings Point Merchant Marine Academy in New York State. Upon Graduation, he turned down a well-paying job with standard oil and chose to enlist in the Marine corps as a helicopter pilot at the time of Vietnam War.

After his service in military, Kiyosaki went to work for Xerox Corporation, where he rose to #1 salesperson. He then created the company Rippers, a nylon Velcro wallet company along with his brother. Only in 1996 he with his wife created and launched Cashflow the boardgame and in 1997 Cashflow Technologies, the parent company for the Rich Global LLC and Rich dad company.

Kiyosaki, today is Big time Personal Finance guru and chairman of Rich dad company. The main revenue source of company comes from the franchisees of the Rich dad seminars that are conducted by independent individuals using Kiyosaki’s brand name for the fee. The other sources include revenue from the Cashflow Board games and video games that he dedicated to educate adults and children about business and financial concepts. He also authored 27 financial books and multiple videos preaching his rich dad philosophy. Out of which “Rich dad poor dad” which he wrote in 1997 is sold over million copies and regarded as one of the greatest financial book of all time.

The Bad…        Rippers, the nylon Velcro wallet company of Kiyosaki went Bankrupt Within few years since it started production back in 1977. His next two ventures licensing merchandize for metal rock bands and his early education company also went bankrupt around the next decade.
In 2012, his company Rich Global LLC also filed bankruptcy after it had lost the lawsuit against The Learning Annex, an education company based on New York after Kiyosaki allegedly failed to pay a percentage of profits for using Annex’s backing in his seminars and speaking deals. Rich Global LLC filed chapter 7 Bankruptcy after the Wyoming bankruptcy court passed judgement for them to pay a sum of $23 million to Learning Annex.

Then CEO Mike Sullivan in his statement for New York post about the bankruptcy and the judgment that cause it, told

“The dealings we had with Learning Annex were with a company that hasn't been in business for a number of years . . . I am not surprised Learning Annex is upset and angry, the money doesn't exist in that company, and we can't bring money out of the group.”

"Robert and [wife] Kim are not paying out of personal assets. We have a few million dollars in this company, but not 16 or 20. I can't do anything about a $20 million judgment . . . We got hit for what we think is a completely outlandish figure."

                             Aside from the Plague of Bankruptcies due to the lawsuits from “corporation”, there are also lawsuits filed by the attendees of Kiyosaki’s seminars claiming the over-priced seminars provided information that they could find out in Barnes and Noble. You can read more about this from the report of Pittsburgh’s Action  News by following the link, https://www.wtae.com/article/rich-dad-author-s-seminars-cost-thousands-but-not-everyone-gets-rich/7461146 .

The Ugly….What is more concerning with all this controversies is that prior to the publication of Rich Dad, Poor Dad in 1997, no one have ever documented any vast reserves of wealth earned by Kiyosaki, which was first pointed out by Forbes  in their fallow up on the bankruptcy in 2012.
                   Further the authenticity of rich dad in his book and on whose advises the Kiyosaki empire was built upon is yet to be proven. On the course of several interviews Kiyosaki has change his stance on the mythical rich dad saying he is passed away; he is invalid now; his family requested not to be identified; and on another instances he admitted that Rich Dad ™ is not a single real person, but a composite character based on several of his advisors, including his best friend's father.
And famously in his interview with Smartmoney magazine in 2003 he stated "Is Harry Potter real? Why don't you let Rich Dad be a myth, like Harry Potter?" which could mean nothing or reveal as another marketing lie similar to his previous work “If You Want To Be Rich & Happy Don't Go To School” (which he didn’t really mean) and the problem comes when the readers realize that if one things can be a lie what stopping him to do the same in all other things said in the book to benefit his agenda.

 

“Rich dad poor dad.” What I learned.

 

Rich dad poor dad gives an account of the views and lifestyle of the poor and compares it to the mindset, strategies and efficiency of the rich. Kiyosaki uses his working class dad and his business mentor to draw this distinction.
The core solution “Rich dad poor dad” comes up with is that to attain financial literacy, which is given poorly by schools and one’s middle-class circle.

What the poor do wrong?  A person who grew up around folks who did not have any success in making money and learning from their methods is more likely to miss the mark by long shot about making money as it is evident from their less to no acquisitions of wealth. Money is often misinterpreted around poor and their techniques to save it ranges from silly to ridiculous says Rich Dad Poor Dad.

Money? Poor sees money as tangible/ as a real physical entity, which is wrong perspective as money is made up and sooner rather than later money will become intangible thanks to modern banking, bitcoin etc.
Kiyosaki advices the standard at which money/wealthy should be measured is to understand a person’s ability to survive X number of days Forward if he stopped working.

Should you get a job?  Poor sees jobs as a method that will earn them money, as well as social status if they could manage it. This is not a correct approach rather view jobs as an opportunity learn real world skill and money as its byproduct. Do not take up a job just because you are graduated or because your parents said so or definitely not if you think it is a way to make money.

How to make money? The first and most basic rule to make money is to buy Assets (something that puts money on your pocket) and not Liability (something that spends money out of your pocket) as per Rich dad Poor dad. Most of it, what poor does is getting a job, working hard, making money, then spending money and realizing that the money is not enough for spending, so they work harder and the cycle goes on. Kiyosaki calls this never ending cycle the rat race.
This does not mean never to buy any liability at all, buy them when you produce extra cash, in other words buy them if you could afford it.

Financial literacy.  Kiyosaki states that not knowing this rule of asset/liability rule, about money and anything valid about maintaining one’s finance is the prominent cause for most among us remaining poor and this is where our schools has failed us. The one credible path through which one could choose climb the ladder of wealth is attaining financial literacy. Mastering financial literacy is mastering its four parts; accounting (which is the ability read numbers), Investing (which is the science of making money), Understanding the market (which is to understand the supply and demand) and the law states the book.

 

What I critic?

The book also can be a marketing device for Kiyosaki’s board game “Cashflow” and his high priced seminars. Throughout the book he would capture the attention by giving facts and then providing his products and services as a solutions. Even though the plea to acquire “formulas” from seminars and business books and to try them is not as noble as it appears, you can’t entirely fault the guy as he is a sales and this is what all good sales man do.

 

Bottom-line

The book provides valuable insight on how a rich and poor person’s mind works and how that influences their path towards financial freedom. It does briefly touches on taxes, money, corporation and all the stratergy that the rich use to acquire wealth, the education of which Kiyosaki calls financial literacy. This comes along with his marketing for his board game and seminars which could be omitted. Anyhow Rich dad Poor dad is a good source any complete beginner to start learning about money and all thing that comes with it.


 

References and citation

“Robert T. Kiyosaki.”  About.  Richadad.  Retrieved 05 September, 2020.  https://www.richdad.com/about/robert-t-kiyosaki . 

“Robert Kiyosaki.”  Wikipedia.  Retrieved 05 September, 2020.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Kiyosaki .

Kim, Susanna.  “'Rich Dad, Poor Dad' Author Files for Bankruptcy for His Company.”  Abcnews  12 October, 2012.  Retrieved 05 September, 2020.  https://abcnews.go.com/Business/rich-dad-poor-dad-author-files-bankruptcy/story?id=17463158
Share:

Sunday 9 August 2020

Harry Potter and the Philosopher's stone. A book review.

 

Harry Potter and the philosopher’s stone is about a young boy living with his aunt, uncle, and their bully of a son as his parents were killed by a car accident when he was just a baby, or so he was told by his aunt and uncle. The Dursleys (his uncle and aunt) did not provide him with any sort of joy or comfort growing up, he spends most time sleeping in a spider ridden cupboard and was given everything their son Dudley broke or had enough of. Further, Harry was frowned upon on everything he did and the strange thing keeps happening around him like the disappearance of the glass frame that prevented the boa constrictor from slithering out in their visit to the zoo did not help either. But fortunately for him, things took a wizardly turn, as he was invited to have his wizard education in the biggest wizard school in existence. He went on to learn how wizards over thousands of years shielded themselves from being noticed by muggles (ordinary and non-magic people like his uncle Vernon and his family) and how his parents were killed by fighting the biggest lord of dark magic, Voldemort for protecting him and about the eventual defeat and disappearance of the said dark lord, Voldemort by him when he was just a baby for which he is famous all over the wizardry world. With his new-found knowledge, he now begins his journey, having a tremendous potential for magic which he was born with and the humility that he attained by living with the Dursleys.

 

What do I think?

This is the very first book in the infamous Harry Potter series which instantly shot through the roof among the English speaking world at its release in 1995 and over subsequent years, also the near-perfect adaptation into a movie in 2001 made the phenomena unavoidable irrespective of the boundaries of the language. The real-life story of the Joanne Rowling leading up to writing this book is as motivational as the story that the book unveils of the boy, unloved making his way to his destiny in a world filled with magic and hardship using his heart and compassion.

 

‘’ I had failed on an epic scale. An exceptionally short-lived marriage had imploded, and I was jobless, a lone parent, and as poor as it is possible to be in modern Britain, without being homeless. The fears that my parents had for me, and that I had had for myself, had both come to pass, and by every usual standard, I was the biggest failure I knew.” 

-         J. K. Rowling (in her Harvard commencement speech)

 

She added,

 

“……..failure meant a stripping away of the inessential. I stopped pretending to myself that I was anything other than what I was, and began to direct all my energy into finishing the only work that mattered to me. Had I really succeeded at anything else, I might never have found the determination to succeed in the one arena I believed I truly belonged. I was set free, because my greatest fear had been realised, and I was still alive, and I still had a daughter whom I adored, and I had an old typewriter and a big idea. And so rock bottom became the solid foundation on which I rebuilt my life.”

 

 However great the following books might be of Potter, this one had a truly great story both in and out of the page in the binding, of both its protagonist and of the author who wrote him.

 

             Worldbuilding is one of the important aspects of the fantasy genre and Rowling’s concept of students going to a school to learn magic is pretty novel and a cool concept. Treading the path of perceiving wizardry as light-hearted and amusing rather than sinister and veil as seen in many literary works and through most, the human culture is well appreciated and since then many tried to emulate.

     

[   Note :

Joanne Rowling, better known by her initials J K, does not have a middle name, according to her birth certificate. The use of the author's initials instead of her full name was a marketing ploy designed to make her work acceptable to boys, who actively choose not to read books by women.]

 

     

   

 

 

 

                          

 

 

Forming spells and enchantments out of classical language such as Latin made them sound more dense and authentic rather than using gibberish for the spells (Thanks to her French and classical degree from the University of Exeter). Hermione Granger is the most entertaining character at least within these books as with her missy too good attitude and her prowess in the spells to back it up but flawed in the social skill as she became cringey and flat-out annoying at some times. Her arc from being a teacher’s pet with no real friends, also being most fixated on rules to breaking rules for friendship is my favorite part of the book. What is more impressive is that while doing all that she did not take away the spotlight from ‘Harry” who was still present as the Hero and was interesting in his own right.

     

[   Note:

Hermione Granger was Based on Rowling own self from her school days, as the author remembers herself as a book wormy little daughter of Anne, a science technician in the Chemistry department at Wyedean Comprehensive, where she herself went to school and Peter, an aircraft engineer at the Rolls Royce factory in Bristol.]

 

 

     

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bottom-line: 

“Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s stone” is an easily digestible read, with an immaculate world of magic ready to be explored, having the relatable backdrop of school life. 

 

 

              Works Cited

Rowling, J.K. “Text of J.k.Rowling’s speech.”  The Harvard gazette.  https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2008/06/text-of-j-k-rowling-speech/ . Retrieved August 09, 2020.  

Savil, Richard. “Harry Potter and the mystery JK’s lost initial.” 

The Telegraph July 19, 2000.  https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1349288/Harry-Potter-and-the-mystery-of-J-Ks-lost-initial.html . Retrieved August 09, 2020.

“About J.K. Rowling.”  Jkrowlinghttps://www.jkrowling.com/about/ . Retrieved August 09, 2020. 

 

Share: